Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22891 - 22900 of 29823 for des.
Search results 22891 - 22900 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138978 - 2015-04-07
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138978 - 2015-04-07
State v. Daniel T. Shea
. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-03-31
. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-03-31
State v. Roy J. Jones
reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13720 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73 Wis.2d 656, 664, 245 N.W.2d 656, 660 (1976). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13720 - 2005-03-31
Rsidue, LLC v. Michael R. Michaud
of the § 425.109. Thus, the question before us is one of statutory interpretation, a question we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25885 - 2006-08-29
of the § 425.109. Thus, the question before us is one of statutory interpretation, a question we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25885 - 2006-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
. This presents a question of law we review de novo. World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Mikulsky, 2002 WI 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27406 - 2006-12-11
. This presents a question of law we review de novo. World Wide Prosthetic Supply, Inc. v. Mikulsky, 2002 WI 26
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27406 - 2006-12-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusions de novo. Mueller v. LIRC, 2019 WI App 50, ¶17, 388 Wis. 2d 602, 933 N.W.2d 645. However, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601773 - 2022-12-20
conclusions de novo. Mueller v. LIRC, 2019 WI App 50, ¶17, 388 Wis. 2d 602, 933 N.W.2d 645. However, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601773 - 2022-12-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. A referee's findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168305 - 2017-09-21
. A referee's findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168305 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer Lehman
’ attention is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122 Wis.2d 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13103 - 2017-09-21
’ attention is a question of law, which we review de novo. See Tahtinen v. MSI Ins. Co., 122 Wis.2d 158
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13103 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
standards to those facts de novo. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105, ¶88, 255 Wis. 2d 537, 648 N.W.2d 829
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253420 - 2020-02-06
standards to those facts de novo. State v. Vorburger, 2002 WI 105, ¶88, 255 Wis. 2d 537, 648 N.W.2d 829
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253420 - 2020-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings unless clearly erroneous. See id. ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133135 - 2017-09-21
questions of law de novo, but we do not disturb factual findings unless clearly erroneous. See id. ¶19
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133135 - 2017-09-21