Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22891 - 22900 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 22891 - 22900 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Pearl A. Powers v. Thomas F. Powers
on appeal is the trial court’s ruling that Thomas and Pearl A. Powers did not intend to make a gift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11947 - 2005-03-31
on appeal is the trial court’s ruling that Thomas and Pearl A. Powers did not intend to make a gift
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11947 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Knapp
of sentence, but not known to the trial court at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9261 - 2017-09-19
of sentence, but not known to the trial court at the time of original sentencing, either because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9261 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Marathon County v. Daniel J. Hart
the court’s default judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5113 - 2017-09-19
the court’s default judgment against him. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5113 - 2017-09-19
Scott K. Reed v. Brenda L. Bradley
Insurance Company.[1] Prior to trial, the other driver’s insurer, American Family Mutual Insurance Company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2274 - 2005-03-31
Insurance Company.[1] Prior to trial, the other driver’s insurer, American Family Mutual Insurance Company
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2274 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edron D. Broomfield
effective assistance from trial counsel. Because we conclude that counsel’s representation did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12069 - 2005-03-31
effective assistance from trial counsel. Because we conclude that counsel’s representation did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph P. Buchholz
. § 961.41(1m)(h)1 (1999-2000). 1 The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4161 - 2017-09-20
. § 961.41(1m)(h)1 (1999-2000). 1 The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4161 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
) the prosecutor presented evidence at trial that had no relevance to this case; (4) the prosecutor vouched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105004 - 2013-12-02
) the prosecutor presented evidence at trial that had no relevance to this case; (4) the prosecutor vouched
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105004 - 2013-12-02
State v. James W. McMillen
, intentional damage to physical property, and criminal trespass. The trial court imposed a fine and costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8360 - 2005-03-31
, intentional damage to physical property, and criminal trespass. The trial court imposed a fine and costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8360 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel L. Hanson
that the trial court should have allowed him to withdraw No. 02-0045-CR 2 his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
that the trial court should have allowed him to withdraw No. 02-0045-CR 2 his no contest plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4806 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Louis M. Anderson
for postconviction relief. The only issue he raises on appeal is whether the trial court erred by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10105 - 2017-09-19
for postconviction relief. The only issue he raises on appeal is whether the trial court erred by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10105 - 2017-09-19