Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2291 - 2300 of 29810 for des.
Search results 2291 - 2300 of 29810 for des.
Ray M. Thompson v. WI Department of Public Instruction
of law de novo. The court held that the superintendent used an improper standard in revoking Thompson's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8384 - 2005-03-31
of law de novo. The court held that the superintendent used an improper standard in revoking Thompson's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John Q. Kamps v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
a question of law, which we review de novo. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d. 650, 659, 539 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5624 - 2017-09-19
a question of law, which we review de novo. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d. 650, 659, 539 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5624 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment, we employ the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59342 - 2011-01-26
judgment, we employ the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59342 - 2011-01-26
[PDF]
David C. Myers v. Daren Swenson
test the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged in the complaint. We review such motions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6858 - 2017-09-20
test the legal sufficiency of the facts alleged in the complaint. We review such motions de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6858 - 2017-09-20
Shannon Preston v. Meriter Hospital, Inc.
review de novo a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary judgment, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6512 - 2005-03-31
review de novo a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary judgment, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6512 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
court’s decision denying the State’s motion to revoke on my de novo review, I do not separately address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905443 - 2025-01-24
court’s decision denying the State’s motion to revoke on my de novo review, I do not separately address
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=905443 - 2025-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of waiver to these findings is a question of law that we review de novo. Meyer v. Classified Ins. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90881 - 2014-09-15
of waiver to these findings is a question of law that we review de novo. Meyer v. Classified Ins. Corp
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90881 - 2014-09-15
John Q. Kamps v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of a statute and its application to a given set of facts present a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31
of a statute and its application to a given set of facts present a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31
Scott R. Bunker v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
on undisputed facts de novo, and therefore it is not essential to the court’s review that the agency had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4728 - 2005-03-31
on undisputed facts de novo, and therefore it is not essential to the court’s review that the agency had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4728 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Ray M. Thompson v. WI Department of Public Instruction
of this decision, the trial court reversed. The court reviewed the superintendent's conclusions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8384 - 2017-09-19
of this decision, the trial court reversed. The court reviewed the superintendent's conclusions of law de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8384 - 2017-09-19