Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22951 - 22960 of 69898 for hi.
Search results 22951 - 22960 of 69898 for hi.
Sharon Mowery v. James E. Mowery
was to claim Cory and Jaime as exemptions as long as he was ninety percent current in his child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9579 - 2005-03-31
was to claim Cory and Jaime as exemptions as long as he was ninety percent current in his child support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9579 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven E. Benz
of probable cause for his arrest for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13221 - 2005-03-31
of probable cause for his arrest for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13221 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael T. Schmaling
appeals from an order denying his motion for resentencing or, in the alternative, for a modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8281 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his motion for resentencing or, in the alternative, for a modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8281 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Thomas recovered. Thomas received clearance from his physician to return to work, but restrictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45689 - 2014-09-15
Thomas recovered. Thomas received clearance from his physician to return to work, but restrictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45689 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in his sweatshirt pocket. ¶3 Pittman moved to suppress the evidence and argued that the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26
in his sweatshirt pocket. ¶3 Pittman moved to suppress the evidence and argued that the officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237938 - 2019-03-26
State v. Donnie Cobbs
for burglary in violation of § 943.10(1)(a), Stats., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12530 - 2005-03-31
for burglary in violation of § 943.10(1)(a), Stats., and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12530 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to revoke his operating privileges for refusing to submit to a blood alcohol test. ¶3 Stokes filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21
to revoke his operating privileges for refusing to submit to a blood alcohol test. ¶3 Stokes filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102984 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying his motion to suppress the result of a preliminary breath test that had been administered pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91012 - 2012-12-26
in denying his motion to suppress the result of a preliminary breath test that had been administered pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91012 - 2012-12-26
State v. John A. Aschenbrener
to have his testimony excluded because Jurek incorrectly advised Aschenbrener. Jurek stated that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31
to have his testimony excluded because Jurek incorrectly advised Aschenbrener. Jurek stated that he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3326 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty pleas of fleeing/eluding an officer and second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282060 - 2020-08-27
from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty pleas of fleeing/eluding an officer and second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=282060 - 2020-08-27