Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 22971 - 22980 of 68728 for did.
Search results 22971 - 22980 of 68728 for did.
State v. Edward W. Fisher
erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not consider mitigating factors supporting a lighter sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18559 - 2005-07-26
erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not consider mitigating factors supporting a lighter sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18559 - 2005-07-26
COURT OF APPEALS
that Legacy did not intentionally control or take property belonging to the Actkins. Because the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52418 - 2010-07-27
that Legacy did not intentionally control or take property belonging to the Actkins. Because the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52418 - 2010-07-27
State v. Mahlick D. Ellington
defense was that her injuries did not constitute “great bodily harm.” “‘Great bodily’ harm means bodily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
defense was that her injuries did not constitute “great bodily harm.” “‘Great bodily’ harm means bodily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20039 - 2005-12-11
State v. James A. Montgomery
this court to conclude that Montgomery did not meet his burden of proving the existence of the six additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12979 - 2005-03-31
this court to conclude that Montgomery did not meet his burden of proving the existence of the six additional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12979 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
One of Missimer’s defenses to the complaint was that she did not have an obligation to pay Ross’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36410 - 2009-05-06
One of Missimer’s defenses to the complaint was that she did not have an obligation to pay Ross’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36410 - 2009-05-06
[PDF]
Erin T. O'Connor v. Stuart Korshavn
the court to waive Butler’s personal appearance. The court did so, and ultimately granted the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5500 - 2017-09-19
the court to waive Butler’s personal appearance. The court did so, and ultimately granted the divorce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5500 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 121
was not material to their sales contract because the sales contract did not represent that the home was defect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102007 - 2017-09-21
was not material to their sales contract because the sales contract did not represent that the home was defect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102007 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, and that the business did not “fit in with the vision for the area.” • A Board member stated “that EZMONEY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39284 - 2014-09-15
, and that the business did not “fit in with the vision for the area.” • A Board member stated “that EZMONEY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39284 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 24, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
for what my daddy did?” Howard stated that T.K. also told her that: (1) Reginald would put C.T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64622 - 2011-05-23
for what my daddy did?” Howard stated that T.K. also told her that: (1) Reginald would put C.T
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64622 - 2011-05-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” George did not, however, provide proof of any law enforcement or governmental authority. ¶7 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324949 - 2021-01-20
.” George did not, however, provide proof of any law enforcement or governmental authority. ¶7 While
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=324949 - 2021-01-20