Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2301 - 2310 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2301 - 2310 of 30059 for de.
State v. Ralph Ovadal
, Ovadal's position nonetheless has some intuitive appeal. This court will therefore undertake a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15840 - 2005-03-31
, Ovadal's position nonetheless has some intuitive appeal. This court will therefore undertake a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15840 - 2005-03-31
United Wisconsin Insurance Company v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
.” United appeals claiming: (1) either LIRC’s decision should be reviewed “de novo” or, if its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13445 - 2005-03-31
.” United appeals claiming: (1) either LIRC’s decision should be reviewed “de novo” or, if its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13445 - 2005-03-31
City of Marshfield v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3783 - 2005-03-31
deference or de novo review, depending on the circumstances. UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3783 - 2005-03-31
Kraft Foods, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
impression it is entitled to “due weight” or “great bearing.” The lowest level of review, the de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2817 - 2005-03-31
impression it is entitled to “due weight” or “great bearing.” The lowest level of review, the de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2817 - 2005-03-31
David C. Myers v. Daren Swenson
. We review such motions de novo. We also independently determine whether a court has competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6858 - 2005-03-31
. We review such motions de novo. We also independently determine whether a court has competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6858 - 2005-03-31
Ray M. Thompson v. WI Department of Public Instruction
of law de novo. The court held that the superintendent used an improper standard in revoking Thompson's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8384 - 2005-03-31
of law de novo. The court held that the superintendent used an improper standard in revoking Thompson's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8384 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John Q. Kamps v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
a question of law, which we review de novo. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d. 650, 659, 539 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5624 - 2017-09-19
a question of law, which we review de novo. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d. 650, 659, 539 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5624 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment, we employ the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59342 - 2011-01-26
judgment, we employ the same methodology as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59342 - 2011-01-26
[PDF]
WI App 61
are to review the circuit court’s interpretation and application of the priority statute de novo. The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008493 - 2025-11-20
are to review the circuit court’s interpretation and application of the priority statute de novo. The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1008493 - 2025-11-20
John Q. Kamps v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of a statute and its application to a given set of facts present a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31
of a statute and its application to a given set of facts present a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31