Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2301 - 2310 of 29713 for des.
Search results 2301 - 2310 of 29713 for des.
David C. Myers v. Daren Swenson
. We review such motions de novo. We also independently determine whether a court has competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6858 - 2005-03-31
. We review such motions de novo. We also independently determine whether a court has competency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6858 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews the terms of a lease (be it commercial or residential) de novo. Walters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619577 - 2023-02-08
OF REVIEW ¶6 This court reviews the terms of a lease (be it commercial or residential) de novo. Walters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=619577 - 2023-02-08
[PDF]
Shannon Preston v. Meriter Hospital, Inc.
OF REVIEW ¶9 We review de novo a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary judgment, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6512 - 2017-09-19
OF REVIEW ¶9 We review de novo a trial court’s decision on a motion for summary judgment, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6512 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 86
. Standard of Review. ¶14 The parties do not dispute that de novo review is appropriate here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177493 - 2017-09-21
. Standard of Review. ¶14 The parties do not dispute that de novo review is appropriate here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177493 - 2017-09-21
State v. Benard Treadwell
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12165 - 2005-03-31
the deficiency or the prejudice prong is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Id. at 634, 369 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12165 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 19, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
ineffective assistance of counsel, and because the effect of the trial court’s error was de minimis, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83737 - 2012-06-18
ineffective assistance of counsel, and because the effect of the trial court’s error was de minimis, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83737 - 2012-06-18
[PDF]
WI APP 12
review de novo the trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31279 - 2014-09-15
review de novo the trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31279 - 2014-09-15
John Q. Kamps v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
of a statute and its application to a given set of facts present a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31
of a statute and its application to a given set of facts present a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5624 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin T. Holtet
the trial court came to its decision is irrelevant. We review the issues raised by this appeal de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8073 - 2005-03-31
the trial court came to its decision is irrelevant. We review the issues raised by this appeal de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8073 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ralph Ovadal
, Ovadal's position nonetheless has some intuitive appeal. This court will therefore undertake a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15840 - 2005-03-31
, Ovadal's position nonetheless has some intuitive appeal. This court will therefore undertake a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15840 - 2005-03-31