Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23051 - 23060 of 46086 for paternity test paper work.

COURT OF APPEALS
off the engine and exit the car. The officer had Ross perform several field sobriety tests; Ross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33954 - 2008-09-08

State v. C&S Management, Inc.
. The analysis applied to these forms of legislation is termed the “rational basis test” and only measures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8332 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Higgenbottom passed field sobriety tests, Jaramillo asked Ferguson to exit the car. As she did, he saw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190428 - 2017-09-21

Doris Hanson v. Kelly M. Sangermano
. The test is “whether the attorney knew or should have known that the position taken was frivolous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10914 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Cara A. Erickson
“probable cause to conclude that a blood test might furnish evidence of a crime.” Id. at 864-65
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4701 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Richard M. Filing v. Commercial Union Midwest Insurance Company
operate under the principle that the test is not what the insurer intended the words to mean, but rather
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12786 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The test for reasonable suspicion is “a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209161 - 2018-03-06

COURT OF APPEALS
, 2003 WI 111, ¶20, 264 Wis. 2d 571, 665 N.W.2d 305. That test is the same as the test applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34965 - 2008-12-22

State v. Johnny K. Pinder
test the United States Supreme Court established in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). In Day v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25053 - 2006-05-08

Michael J. Gendrich v. Jon Litscher
. The test on certiorari review is the substantial evidence test. Madison Teachers, Inc. v. WERC, 218 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3443 - 2005-03-31