Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23211 - 23220 of 30245 for de.
Search results 23211 - 23220 of 30245 for de.
State v. Richard J. Kenyon
. Since the pertinent facts are undisputed, we are presented with a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14040 - 2005-03-31
. Since the pertinent facts are undisputed, we are presented with a question of law, which we decide de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14040 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 22
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28173 - 2014-09-15
are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14, ¶5, 269 Wis. 2d 43
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28173 - 2014-09-15
Greg LaFond v. David Elvig
). The legal sufficiency of the complaint is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Wausau Tile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5855 - 2005-03-31
). The legal sufficiency of the complaint is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. Wausau Tile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5855 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah E.
subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4680 - 2005-03-31
subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4680 - 2005-03-31
State v. Deborah E.
subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4681 - 2005-03-31
subject to de novo review. See State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862-63, 537 N.W.2d 47 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4681 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. “The interpretation of an insurance policy presents a question of law that we review de novo.” Marotz v. Hallman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954199 - 2025-05-13
. “The interpretation of an insurance policy presents a question of law that we review de novo.” Marotz v. Hallman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954199 - 2025-05-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983932 - 2025-07-16
the circuit court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983932 - 2025-07-16
State v. Steven R. Horton
review such legal questions de novo. See Winiarski v. Miicke, 186 Wis.2d 409, 412, 521 N.W.2d 162, 164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7742 - 2005-03-31
review such legal questions de novo. See Winiarski v. Miicke, 186 Wis.2d 409, 412, 521 N.W.2d 162, 164
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7742 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however, “the motion does not raise facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38398 - 2009-07-27
to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Ibid. If, however, “the motion does not raise facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38398 - 2009-07-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617844 - 2023-02-02
. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617844 - 2023-02-02