Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23211 - 23220 of 29821 for des.
Search results 23211 - 23220 of 29821 for des.
Frontsheet
137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29225 - 2007-05-29
137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29225 - 2007-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that this court decides de novo.” Menard, Inc. v. Liteway Lighting Prods., 2005 WI 98, ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35945 - 2009-05-11
is a question of law that this court decides de novo.” Menard, Inc. v. Liteway Lighting Prods., 2005 WI 98, ¶23
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35945 - 2009-05-11
Frontsheet
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29263 - 2007-05-31
Sosnay, 209 Wis. 2d 241, 243, 562 N.W.2d 137 (1997). We review the referee's conclusions of law on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29263 - 2007-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
despite the identified inadequacy of the plea colloquy. Id., ¶40. This court determines de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45543 - 2010-01-12
despite the identified inadequacy of the plea colloquy. Id., ¶40. This court determines de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45543 - 2010-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
Standard of Review. We determine de novo whether the defendant’s postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
Standard of Review. We determine de novo whether the defendant’s postconviction motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34028 - 2008-09-16
[PDF]
State v. Jay D. Harris
which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. ¶18 Harris argues that his trial counsel did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16062 - 2017-09-21
which we review de novo. See id. at 236-37. ¶18 Harris argues that his trial counsel did not make
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16062 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is ambiguous are both questions of law we review de novo.” Huml v. Vlazny, 2006 WI 87, ¶13, 293 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82352 - 2014-09-15
is ambiguous are both questions of law we review de novo.” Huml v. Vlazny, 2006 WI 87, ¶13, 293 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82352 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of fact are binding on us unless clearly erroneous. Under our de novo review of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27492 - 2014-09-15
of fact are binding on us unless clearly erroneous. Under our de novo review of the constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27492 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and applying a statute to a set of facts are both questions of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485107 - 2022-02-22
and applying a statute to a set of facts are both questions of law which this court reviews de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=485107 - 2022-02-22
[PDF]
Rsidue, LLC v. Michael R. Michaud
we decide de novo. See Gold v. City of Adams, 2002 WI App 45, ¶7, 251 Wis. 2d 312, 641 N.W.2d 446
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25885 - 2017-09-21
we decide de novo. See Gold v. City of Adams, 2002 WI App 45, ¶7, 251 Wis. 2d 312, 641 N.W.2d 446
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25885 - 2017-09-21