Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23371 - 23380 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23371 - 23380 of 29823 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
of proof as to its claim of negligence is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135621 - 2015-02-25
of proof as to its claim of negligence is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135621 - 2015-02-25
State v. Sylvester Gordon
muster, are questions of law which we review de novo. Id. The United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13177 - 2005-03-31
muster, are questions of law which we review de novo. Id. The United States
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13177 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, whether counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32195 - 2008-03-25
, whether counsel’s conduct amounted to ineffective assistance is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32195 - 2008-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138978 - 2015-04-07
the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Grady, 2009 WI 47, ¶13, 317 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138978 - 2015-04-07
State v. Daniel T. Shea
. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-03-31
. Because statutory interpretation is a question of law, we apply a de novo standard of review. See Hughes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12880 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
we review de novo. Id. ¶11 A postconviction Machner hearing is a prerequisite to appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36376 - 2009-05-04
we review de novo. Id. ¶11 A postconviction Machner hearing is a prerequisite to appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36376 - 2009-05-04
COURT OF APPEALS
334 (citations omitted). Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See Love
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113805 - 2014-06-09
334 (citations omitted). Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law we review de novo. See Love
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113805 - 2014-06-09
2010 WI App 121
appeal. This presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Drinkwater v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53145 - 2011-08-21
appeal. This presents a question of law subject to our de novo review. See Drinkwater v. American
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53145 - 2011-08-21
State v. John E. Olson
review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis.2d 687, 699, 508 N.W.2d 54, 59 (Ct. App. 1993). “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. See State v. Neumann, 179 Wis.2d 687, 699, 508 N.W.2d 54, 59 (Ct. App. 1993). “[T]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11160 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rossi & Mills Partnership v. Ronald F. Schuler
to that question. The construction of a written contract is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13920 - 2014-09-15
to that question. The construction of a written contract is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13920 - 2014-09-15