Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23371 - 23380 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23371 - 23380 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
School Board of the Pardeeville Area School District v. Cynthia V. Bomber
is a question of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s determination. Sievert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12506 - 2014-09-15
is a question of law which we review de novo, owing no deference to the trial court’s determination. Sievert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12506 - 2014-09-15
WI App 46 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP685-CR Complete Title ...
is a constitutional issue that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶14 A defendant who requests resentencing due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79496 - 2012-04-24
is a constitutional issue that we review de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶14 A defendant who requests resentencing due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79496 - 2012-04-24
John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
of § 88.87(2), Stats. Retroactive application of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31
of § 88.87(2), Stats. Retroactive application of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31
State v. Greg D. Griswold
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. De CHAMBEAU, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9345 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT A. De CHAMBEAU, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9345 - 2005-03-31
Harold C. Lane, Jr. v. Sharp Packaging Systems, Inc.
a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim de novo. Town of Eagle, 191 Wis. 2d at 311-12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3720 - 2005-03-31
a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim de novo. Town of Eagle, 191 Wis. 2d at 311-12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3720 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John S. Provo
. Id. We review whether defense counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6624 - 2017-09-19
. Id. We review whether defense counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6624 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
Conserve summary judgment. Culver now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a summary judgment ruling de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56840 - 2010-11-15
Conserve summary judgment. Culver now appeals. DISCUSSION ¶13 We review a summary judgment ruling de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56840 - 2010-11-15
[PDF]
State v. Alexander R. Armstrong
are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
are questions of law, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Fred Carlson v. Trailer Equipment and Supply, Inc.
on summary judgment de novo. See id. Second, we review the denial of Carlson’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14916 - 2017-09-21
on summary judgment de novo. See id. Second, we review the denial of Carlson’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14916 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal question” that we review de novo. See LaCombe v. Aurora Med. Grp., Inc., 2004 WI App 119, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186559 - 2017-09-21
is a legal question” that we review de novo. See LaCombe v. Aurora Med. Grp., Inc., 2004 WI App 119, ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186559 - 2017-09-21