Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23371 - 23380 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 23371 - 23380 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. Paul R. Benzel
. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that State v. Hall, 207 Wis.2d 54, 557 N.W.2d 778 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13346 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court denied the motion, concluding that State v. Hall, 207 Wis.2d 54, 557 N.W.2d 778 (1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13346 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the circuit court’s ruling, defense counsel advised that nothing further required discussion. At trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
of the circuit court’s ruling, defense counsel advised that nothing further required discussion. At trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=830163 - 2024-07-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
WIS. STAT. § 940.47 (2013-14). 2 ¶3 Following a consolidated trial, Thames was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157115 - 2017-09-21
WIS. STAT. § 940.47 (2013-14). 2 ¶3 Following a consolidated trial, Thames was convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157115 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that Olmsted’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the State’s sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
that Olmsted’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the State’s sentencing recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29039 - 2007-05-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeal, based on the State’s concession of error, we held that Olmsted’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29039 - 2014-09-15
appeal, based on the State’s concession of error, we held that Olmsted’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29039 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion without a hearing. Green argues that: (1) he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331042 - 2021-02-09
motion without a hearing. Green argues that: (1) he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=331042 - 2021-02-09
[PDF]
State v. Randy A. Schill
are multiplicitous; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for not arguing multiplicity, for not objecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7387 - 2017-09-20
are multiplicitous; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for not arguing multiplicity, for not objecting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7387 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
ineffective assistance of his trial counsel, William Lamb. He argues that Lamb failed to adequately cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32051 - 2014-09-15
ineffective assistance of his trial counsel, William Lamb. He argues that Lamb failed to adequately cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32051 - 2014-09-15
State v. Matthew A. Joas
and therefore the trial court should have suppressed any evidence resulting from the stop. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26055 - 2006-08-01
and therefore the trial court should have suppressed any evidence resulting from the stop. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26055 - 2006-08-01
State v. Kevin J. Hauschultz
postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7323 - 2005-03-31
postconviction motion in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He argues that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7323 - 2005-03-31