Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23381 - 23390 of 29823 for des.
Search results 23381 - 23390 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
State v. Ronald V. Kurszewski
to be a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Wills, 187 Wis.2d 529, 535, 523 N.W.2d 569, 572 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9198 - 2017-09-19
to be a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Wills, 187 Wis.2d 529, 535, 523 N.W.2d 569, 572 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9198 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Roberson, 2006 WI 80, ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667050 - 2023-06-13
the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Roberson, 2006 WI 80, ¶24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=667050 - 2023-06-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s conduct was deficient or prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 634. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161065 - 2017-09-21
counsel’s conduct was deficient or prejudicial are questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 634. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161065 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Fred Carlson v. Trailer Equipment and Supply, Inc.
on summary judgment de novo. See id. Second, we review the denial of Carlson’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14916 - 2017-09-21
on summary judgment de novo. See id. Second, we review the denial of Carlson’s motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14916 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Herbert M. Schauer v. Matthew S. Baker
Discussion ¶4 This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment. We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5392 - 2017-09-19
Discussion ¶4 This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment. We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5392 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Citizens' Utility Board (CUB) v. Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
N.W.2d 99 (1992). ¶8 Construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5457 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 99 (1992). ¶8 Construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5457 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
David Barlow v. Board of Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
, and due process determinations are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20207 - 2017-09-21
, and due process determinations are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20207 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Thomas Strasser v. Transtech Mobile Fleet Service, Inc.
). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14098 - 2014-09-15
). Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14098 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 26
to undisputed facts are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Landis v. Physicians Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=508367 - 2022-08-08
to undisputed facts are questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Landis v. Physicians Ins. Co
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=508367 - 2022-08-08
[PDF]
WI APP 22
held that an agency decision is not automatically one of first impression and subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161398 - 2017-09-21
held that an agency decision is not automatically one of first impression and subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161398 - 2017-09-21