Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23381 - 23390 of 29832 for des.
Search results 23381 - 23390 of 29832 for des.
[PDF]
Angela M. Peabody v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13078 - 2017-09-21
review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court. Green Spring Farms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13078 - 2017-09-21
Robert G. Fish v. Margaret W. Fish
decide de novo, without deference to the trial court. See Levy v. Levy, 130 Wis.2d 523, 528-29, 388 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8082 - 2005-03-31
decide de novo, without deference to the trial court. See Levy v. Levy, 130 Wis.2d 523, 528-29, 388 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8082 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Shane M. Cook
to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Vennemann, 180 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4158 - 2017-09-20
to a set of facts presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Vennemann, 180 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4158 - 2017-09-20
Joyce A. Devenport v. Paper Recycling Company
the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15330 - 2005-03-31
the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15330 - 2005-03-31
WI App 95 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2032 Complete Title ...
review the denial or grant of a summary judgment motion de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64248 - 2011-06-28
review the denial or grant of a summary judgment motion de novo, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64248 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and then review de novo whether those facts met the standard of a valid deed. See WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717783 - 2023-10-24
and then review de novo whether those facts met the standard of a valid deed. See WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2) (2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717783 - 2023-10-24
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
legal standard to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31
legal standard to a set of facts presents a question of law that we review de novo). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7565 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott Edward Ziegler
, including restitution, presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09
, including restitution, presents a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7417 - 2005-05-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed. No. 2025AP2382 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083192 - 2026-02-27
of the circuit court for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Reversed. No. 2025AP2382 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083192 - 2026-02-27
[PDF]
State v. Alan Adin Randall
. Gladney, 120 Wis.2d 486, 490, 355 N.W.2d 547, 549 (Ct. App. 1984). However, we consider de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12115 - 2017-09-21
. Gladney, 120 Wis.2d 486, 490, 355 N.W.2d 547, 549 (Ct. App. 1984). However, we consider de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12115 - 2017-09-21