Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23441 - 23450 of 68886 for e j h.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(h) (2017-18). All references to the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301683 - 2020-11-05

State v. Philip M. Canon
: On behalf of the plaintiff-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of James E. Doyle, attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14880 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable inference are questions of law, which we decide as part of our de novo review. See H&R Block E
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59342 - 2011-01-26

[PDF] NOTICE
as part of our de novo review. See H&R Block E. Enters., Inc. v. Swenson, 2008 WI App 3, ¶11, 307 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59342 - 2014-09-15

State v. Antonio L. Simmons
convictions on his adult record involving misuse of a weapon…. [H]e was arrested [and later convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6540 - 2005-03-31

State v. Carlos C.
of second-degree sexual assault if he or she “[h]as sexual contact or sexual intercourse with another person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5094 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of May 20th…. [H]e had constructive and actual notice of the range of penalties through the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53404 - 2010-08-17

[PDF] WI App 103
in a discharge proceeding. Again, “‘[w]e assume that the legislature’s intent is expressed in the statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52593 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
of May 20th…. [H]e had constructive and actual notice of the range of penalties through the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53404 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“didn’t really want to go to trial” and “[h]e wanted a better deal.” ¶9 By contrast, Gaston
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345626 - 2021-03-16