Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23501 - 23510 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Search results 23501 - 23510 of 59340 for quit claim deed.
Allen J. Thomas v. State
. He claims that the 1976 judgment violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8506 - 2005-03-31
. He claims that the 1976 judgment violated his constitutional right against double jeopardy. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8506 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Herschel Knighton
without Knighton’s consent. To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4910 - 2017-09-19
without Knighton’s consent. To establish an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, a defendant must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4910 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Stewart
to police. By postconviction motion, Stewart claimed that the prosecution NO. 97-0149-CR 2 had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11970 - 2017-09-21
to police. By postconviction motion, Stewart claimed that the prosecution NO. 97-0149-CR 2 had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11970 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
claims of error and we therefore affirm the order. ¶2 In February 1984, a jury convicted Vance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47629 - 2010-03-08
claims of error and we therefore affirm the order. ¶2 In February 1984, a jury convicted Vance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47629 - 2010-03-08
[PDF]
State v. James T. Rogers
on Rogers’ claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call witness Sarah Couper at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13955 - 2014-09-15
on Rogers’ claim that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call witness Sarah Couper at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13955 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Patrick T. Roberts
claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim, often by showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9606 - 2017-09-19
claiming impermissibly disparate sentences have the burden of proving this claim, often by showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9606 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. If Huber claims that his revocation counsel was ineffective, he must show that the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30292 - 2007-09-17
. If Huber claims that his revocation counsel was ineffective, he must show that the decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30292 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
counsel’s promises. Specifically, he claims that his trial counsel told him that “he would only get a 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026124 - 2025-10-22
counsel’s promises. Specifically, he claims that his trial counsel told him that “he would only get a 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026124 - 2025-10-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
the Village’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse. No. 2007AP429 2 ¶2 Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30239 - 2014-09-15
the Village’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations. We reverse. No. 2007AP429 2 ¶2 Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30239 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
litigation.” State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Therefore, any claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109264 - 2014-03-18
litigation.” State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Therefore, any claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109264 - 2014-03-18