Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2361 - 2370 of 45121 for Cost-effective.
Search results 2361 - 2370 of 45121 for Cost-effective.
[PDF]
WI 21
the costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which are $2579.81 as of December 13, 2006. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28172 - 2014-09-15
the costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which are $2579.81 as of December 13, 2006. Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28172 - 2014-09-15
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James H. Martin
that the Board had urged. The referee also recommended that Attorney Martin be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17481 - 2005-03-31
that the Board had urged. The referee also recommended that Attorney Martin be required to pay the costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17481 - 2005-03-31
Sheila R. McDonald v. Ardyth M. McDonald
Sheila moves for costs, contending Ardyth’s appeal[2] is frivolous because her arguments have no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
Sheila moves for costs, contending Ardyth’s appeal[2] is frivolous because her arguments have no basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25523 - 2006-07-25
Rosanne L. Johnson v. Michael E. Royalty, Jr.
custody of the parties’ two children to Johnson. He also ordered each party to contribute to the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13458 - 2011-07-31
custody of the parties’ two children to Johnson. He also ordered each party to contribute to the cost
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13458 - 2011-07-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). On appeal, Gilmour argues that his inability to afford the cost of a jury trial was the primary impetus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83842 - 2012-06-19
). On appeal, Gilmour argues that his inability to afford the cost of a jury trial was the primary impetus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83842 - 2012-06-19
[PDF]
WI App 30
to the systemic problems.” In addition to the costs to repair this damage, the McLaughlins seek to recover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=788828 - 2024-06-20
to the systemic problems.” In addition to the costs to repair this damage, the McLaughlins seek to recover
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=788828 - 2024-06-20
Frontsheet
to impose the costs of this proceeding upon Attorney Thibodeau and we accede to that recommendation. ¶3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30307 - 2007-09-17
to impose the costs of this proceeding upon Attorney Thibodeau and we accede to that recommendation. ¶3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30307 - 2007-09-17
[PDF]
WI 118
days. The OLR has stated that it does not seek to impose the costs of this proceeding upon Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30307 - 2014-09-15
days. The OLR has stated that it does not seek to impose the costs of this proceeding upon Attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30307 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the director of the matter. Failure to furnish the notice within 20 days of the effective date of the order
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=487770 - 2022-02-22
the director of the matter. Failure to furnish the notice within 20 days of the effective date of the order
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=487770 - 2022-02-22
Albert Trostel & Sons Company v. Employers Insurance of Wausau
) it is entitled to costs it incurred to defend the case up until the point in time when the coverage issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9145 - 2005-03-31
) it is entitled to costs it incurred to defend the case up until the point in time when the coverage issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9145 - 2005-03-31