Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23741 - 23750 of 29810 for des.

Town of Delafield v. Eric Winkelman
——could not be considered de novo by the court in an equity proceeding because the prior legal
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16614 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether the circuit court has applied the correct legal standard is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=535872 - 2022-06-22

[PDF] Larry Stabenow v. Brenda Jacobsen
this court reviews de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4 Area Bd., 117 Wis. 2d 529, 537, 345 N.W.2d 389
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15275 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Roto Zip Tool Corporation v. Design Concepts, Inc.
from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: ROBERT DE CHAMBEAU, Judge. Reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24668 - 2017-09-21

WI App 31 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP232-AC Complete Title ...
of Wis. Stat. § 49.49(4m)(a)2. to the facts of this case is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92448 - 2013-11-17

[PDF] WI APP 19
on summary judgment is de novo. Behrendt v. Gulf Underwriters Ins. Co., 2009 WI 71, ¶11, 318 Wis. 2d 622
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161897 - 2017-09-21

[PDF]
and NR 1. “Standing presents a question of law for our de novo review.” Metropolitan Builders Ass’n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030573 - 2025-10-28

Gordon Lynch v. Crossroads Counseling Center, Inc.
We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6504 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI APP 26
a question of law for our de novo review. Drinkwater v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co., 2006 WI 56, ¶14, 290
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27918 - 2007-02-27

Frontsheet
, and Stellpflug Law, S.C., De Pere, and oral argument by Sandra L. Hupfer. For the plaintiffs-appellants
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45181 - 2010-04-04