Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23741 - 23750 of 33969 for dismissed.
Search results 23741 - 23750 of 33969 for dismissed.
COURT OF APPEALS
the conclusion of the State’s case-in-chief, and upon MM’s motion to dismiss, the court dismissed the first four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30042 - 2005-03-31
the conclusion of the State’s case-in-chief, and upon MM’s motion to dismiss, the court dismissed the first four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30042 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sexual assault of a child dismissed but read in at sentencing, and the remaining two counts dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58051 - 2010-12-21
sexual assault of a child dismissed but read in at sentencing, and the remaining two counts dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58051 - 2010-12-21
State v. Peter Ballos
have been dismissed for insufficiency of evidence at the preliminary hearing, and the 911 information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14218 - 2005-03-31
have been dismissed for insufficiency of evidence at the preliminary hearing, and the 911 information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14218 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael B. Borhegyi
trial, dismissal of the charges is required. Id. at 522. We review each of these factors in turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13676 - 2008-12-22
trial, dismissal of the charges is required. Id. at 522. We review each of these factors in turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13676 - 2008-12-22
Stanley Washington v. David H. Schwarz
the revocation order. The court dismissed Washington’s certiorari action. Washington further appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2097 - 2008-12-22
the revocation order. The court dismissed Washington’s certiorari action. Washington further appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2097 - 2008-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
depositions were taken, the Clinic moved for summary judgment dismissing Evers’s complaint. In both its brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94911 - 2013-04-01
depositions were taken, the Clinic moved for summary judgment dismissing Evers’s complaint. In both its brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94911 - 2013-04-01
[PDF]
WI APP 24
, and it did. After additional briefing and argument, the court “dismissed” Pamela’s motion to modify child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27899 - 2014-09-15
, and it did. After additional briefing and argument, the court “dismissed” Pamela’s motion to modify child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27899 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 606, 610 N.W.2d 475. ¶26 In Margaret H., the trial court had dismissed a TPR petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204844 - 2017-12-12
Wis. 2d 606, 610 N.W.2d 475. ¶26 In Margaret H., the trial court had dismissed a TPR petition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204844 - 2017-12-12
State v. Victor Naydihor
use charge, and the State would dismiss the remaining charges.[3] The State further agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4610 - 2005-03-31
use charge, and the State would dismiss the remaining charges.[3] The State further agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4610 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to Sims on his claim and dismissed Stapleton Realty’s counterclaim. DISCUSSION ¶12 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30060 - 2007-08-22
to Sims on his claim and dismissed Stapleton Realty’s counterclaim. DISCUSSION ¶12 On appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30060 - 2007-08-22