Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23751 - 23760 of 29713 for des.
Search results 23751 - 23760 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in a given case is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Koller, 2001 WI App 253, ¶32, 248
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228770 - 2018-12-04
in a given case is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Koller, 2001 WI App 253, ¶32, 248
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228770 - 2018-12-04
[PDF]
State v. Maurice E. O'Neal
at the time he gave his consent presents a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7095 - 2017-09-20
at the time he gave his consent presents a question of constitutional fact which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7095 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that we review de novo. Wisconsin DOR v. Menasha Corp., 2008 WI 88, ¶44, 311 Wis. 2d 579, 754 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51715 - 2014-09-15
that we review de novo. Wisconsin DOR v. Menasha Corp., 2008 WI 88, ¶44, 311 Wis. 2d 579, 754 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51715 - 2014-09-15
State v. Dale Steinbach
constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, reviewed de novo by this court. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10716 - 2005-03-31
constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, reviewed de novo by this court. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10716 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
legal standard is a question of law we decide de novo. Gittel v. Abram, 2002 WI App 113, ¶41, 255 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
legal standard is a question of law we decide de novo. Gittel v. Abram, 2002 WI App 113, ¶41, 255 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21
State v. Derrick C. Montriel
a defendant is entitled to sentence credit pursuant to § 973.155 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
a defendant is entitled to sentence credit pursuant to § 973.155 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
Rock County v. Amy L.
of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. The required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14169 - 2005-03-31
of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. The required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14169 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257595 - 2020-04-15
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257595 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
Mary H. Staehler v. Jennifer L. Beuthin
that the plaintiff’s injuries were de minimis or nonexistent. Id. Here, the jury may well have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19
that the plaintiff’s injuries were de minimis or nonexistent. Id. Here, the jury may well have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 15
interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo review. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92339 - 2014-09-15
interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo review. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92339 - 2014-09-15