Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23751 - 23760 of 56214 for n y c.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. DONAVEN C. SPRAGUE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20

[PDF] State v. Peter J. McMaster
. Nordness, 128 Wis. 2d 15, 27, n.5, 381 N.W.2d 300 (1986). This court also agreed that the statute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17014 - 2017-09-21

2010 WI APP 163
P.2d at 586-87 & n.6. The court specifically rejected the state’s argument in favor of an expanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56883 - 2011-08-21

State v. Ronald G. Sorenson
commitment. See Wis. Stat. § 980.02(b) & (c). Sorenson argues that the experts based their evaluations
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17449 - 2005-03-31

2011 WI App 67
of the Commission’s decision (as allowed by § 102.23(1)(c)) would be abrogated. We therefore conclude that whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63160 - 2011-05-25

[PDF] WI APP 93
in the following manner: …. No. 2015AP1832 3 C. Prior to initiating the disposal process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179028 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] The Town of Dayton v. The Waupaca County Zoning Board of Adjustment
, or which would be substantially adverse to property values in the neighborhood affected. (c) No use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4584 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 163
, extended supervision or otherwise, or discharged or terminated from a sentence or commitment. c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56883 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
a permissible death benefit under the 412(i) plan; (c) That the premiums to be paid on these policies qualified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75760 - 2011-12-27

[PDF] WI APP 34
to § 995.50(1)(a) and (c).3 ¶6 The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93174 - 2014-09-15