Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23771 - 23780 of 29713 for des.

[PDF] Frontsheet
to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219028 - 2018-09-12

[PDF] NOTICE
that we review de novo. Wisconsin DOR v. Menasha Corp., 2008 WI 88, ¶44, 311 Wis. 2d 579, 754 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51715 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 116
review de novo. See State v. Cloud, 133 Wis. 2d 58, 61, 393 N.W.2d 123 (Ct. App. 1986). ¶28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28507 - 2014-09-15

State v. Dale Steinbach
constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, reviewed de novo by this court. Id. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10716 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
legal standard is a question of law we decide de novo. Gittel v. Abram, 2002 WI App 113, ¶41, 255 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145492 - 2017-09-21

State v. Derrick C. Montriel
a defendant is entitled to sentence credit pursuant to § 973.155 is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31

Rock County v. Amy L.
of law that we review de novo. Id. at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76. The required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14169 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance of counsel is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257595 - 2020-04-15

[PDF] Mary H. Staehler v. Jennifer L. Beuthin
that the plaintiff’s injuries were de minimis or nonexistent. Id. Here, the jury may well have concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10030 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 15
interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo review. Harnischfeger Corp. v. LIRC, 196 Wis. 2d 650
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92339 - 2014-09-15