Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2381 - 2390 of 49384 for writ of certiorari forms -(/1000).
Search results 2381 - 2390 of 49384 for writ of certiorari forms -(/1000).
Tracy and Damian Osterhues v. Board of Adjustment for Washburn County
for certiorari with the circuit court, alleging six claims for relief, including that the board had proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6774 - 2005-03-31
for certiorari with the circuit court, alleging six claims for relief, including that the board had proceeded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6774 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Tracy and Damian Osterhues v. Board of Adjustment for Washburn County
the committee had made none, it could not reverse the permit. ¶4 Osterhues filed a petition for certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6774 - 2017-09-20
the committee had made none, it could not reverse the permit. ¶4 Osterhues filed a petition for certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6774 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Fidelis I. Omegbu v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District
complaint for injunctive relief to instead state a certiorari action challenging the District’s contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13074 - 2017-09-21
complaint for injunctive relief to instead state a certiorari action challenging the District’s contract
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13074 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Garry A. Borzych v. Daniel Bertrand
. ¶3 Borzych sought certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court found the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20742 - 2017-09-21
. ¶3 Borzych sought certiorari review in the circuit court. The circuit court found the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20742 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
decision in three ways: (1) by certiorari review under Wis. Stat. § 70.47(13)[1]; (2) by filing a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88200 - 2012-10-15
decision in three ways: (1) by certiorari review under Wis. Stat. § 70.47(13)[1]; (2) by filing a written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88200 - 2012-10-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the conditional use permit was not based on substantial evidence. In conducting a certiorari review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142646 - 2017-09-21
the conditional use permit was not based on substantial evidence. In conducting a certiorari review
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142646 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
on substantial evidence. In conducting a certiorari review to determine whether there was substantial evidence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142646 - 2015-05-31
on substantial evidence. In conducting a certiorari review to determine whether there was substantial evidence
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142646 - 2015-05-31
CA Blank Order
sought certiorari review in the circuit court of a decision of the Housing Authority of the City
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144309 - 2015-07-07
sought certiorari review in the circuit court of a decision of the Housing Authority of the City
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144309 - 2015-07-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in an area zoned for agriculture. We conclude that, applying the proper standards relative to certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98639 - 2014-09-15
in an area zoned for agriculture. We conclude that, applying the proper standards relative to certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98639 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Nathan Gillis v. Gary McCaughtry
roughly than necessary after he had filed a certiorari petition in circuit court.1 Gillis alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13957 - 2014-09-15
roughly than necessary after he had filed a certiorari petition in circuit court.1 Gillis alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13957 - 2014-09-15