Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23801 - 23810 of 59336 for do.
Search results 23801 - 23810 of 59336 for do.
State v. Steve A. Johnson
sobriety tests and Johnson agreed to do so. Following the administration of the tests, the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13029 - 2005-03-31
sobriety tests and Johnson agreed to do so. Following the administration of the tests, the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13029 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to amend within the proper time frame, but his asserted facts do not constitute legally sufficient requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
to amend within the proper time frame, but his asserted facts do not constitute legally sufficient requests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39679 - 2009-08-17
Graham L. Smith v. Pamela Mae Smith
to become self-supporting, which it felt she could do within three years. DISCUSSION ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25
to become self-supporting, which it felt she could do within three years. DISCUSSION ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18313 - 2005-05-25
COURT OF APPEALS
of the report or other documentation, which was within Presley’s control to do, we conclude that Presley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31174 - 2007-12-12
of the report or other documentation, which was within Presley’s control to do, we conclude that Presley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31174 - 2007-12-12
Michael E. Stoetzel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
by the Board of Adjustment.” Floodplain Zoning Ordinance §§ 26.02(3) and 26.07(4)(d). The Stoetzels do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4911 - 2005-03-31
by the Board of Adjustment.” Floodplain Zoning Ordinance §§ 26.02(3) and 26.07(4)(d). The Stoetzels do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4911 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven Schelk
to a friend’s house. Jost then asked Schelk to perform field sobriety tests. Schelk was unable to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13486 - 2005-03-31
to a friend’s house. Jost then asked Schelk to perform field sobriety tests. Schelk was unable to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13486 - 2005-03-31
County of Jefferson v. Sean S. Lynch
that they were going to do that.[2] The officer immediately took off to catch up to the vehicle they described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5734 - 2005-03-31
that they were going to do that.[2] The officer immediately took off to catch up to the vehicle they described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5734 - 2005-03-31
Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. Parkland Venture, L.L.C.
to provide a witness list and list of documents by August 15, 1999, and Parkland to do so by September 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2562 - 2005-03-31
to provide a witness list and list of documents by August 15, 1999, and Parkland to do so by September 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2562 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 17, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. In addition, the Gilbertsons do not attempt to refute Fidelity’s argument that its fax did not satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27815 - 2007-01-16
. In addition, the Gilbertsons do not attempt to refute Fidelity’s argument that its fax did not satisfy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27815 - 2007-01-16
Harold L. Johnson v. Don Dahle
the engineer’s actions were not ministerial in nature and do not come under the known danger exception, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13712 - 2005-03-31
the engineer’s actions were not ministerial in nature and do not come under the known danger exception, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13712 - 2005-03-31