Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23901 - 23910 of 74557 for public records.

City of Mequon v. Sarah J. Peacock
. The police had no audio recording of the call nor did they know anything about the informant. Id. Police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5348 - 2005-03-31

City of Mequon v. Kenneth Hosale
building permit and assessment requirements. The record supports the grant of summary judgment to the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11907 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] City of Mequon v. Kenneth Hosale
for and received his building permit. The total fee included $60 for plan review, $51.35 for the public works
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11907 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 24-05 - Interested Persons Communication
Via E-mail Distribution Re: Rule Petition 24-05, Attorney Assessments for Public Interest Legal
/supreme/docs/2405interestedpersons.pdf - 2024-09-05

[PDF] Comment on Supreme Court rule petition 19-07 - Interested persons communication
modifying its confidentiality rules to balance the interests of an accused attorney against the public's
/supreme/docs/1907intpers.pdf - 2019-07-10

[PDF] 21-05 Interested persons communication
/pending/index.htm. The court voted to obtain written comments and schedule a public hearing
/supreme/docs/2105intpers.pdf - 2022-02-04

[PDF] 20-09A - Interested persons communication
of videoconferencing technology. The court conducted a public hearing on April 7, 2021, via videoconference
/supreme/docs/2009ainterestededpersons.pdf - 2022-03-15

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Thomas J. Fink
receive a public reprimand for professional misconduct and that he pay the costs of this proceeding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16443 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
and the need to protect the public. See McCleary v. State, 49 Wis. 2d 263, 276, 182 N.W.2d 512 (1971
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86146 - 2012-08-20

May a newly-elected judge lease office space to a lawyer as part of an agreement between the judge and the lawyer for the purchase of the judge's law practice?
. . . . The comment to this rule notes that public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=902 - 2005-03-31