Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 23971 - 23980 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 23971 - 23980 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals a postconviction order denying her claim that trial counsel was ineffective at sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479448 - 2022-02-08
appeals a postconviction order denying her claim that trial counsel was ineffective at sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479448 - 2022-02-08
WI App 33 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2011AP630-CR Complete Title ...
to Wis. Stat. §§ 946.49(1)(b) and 939.50(3)(h). Powell argues that the trial court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78240 - 2012-03-27
to Wis. Stat. §§ 946.49(1)(b) and 939.50(3)(h). Powell argues that the trial court erred when it denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78240 - 2012-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the 1 The Honorable Steven G. Bauer presided over trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255757 - 2020-03-04
that the 1 The Honorable Steven G. Bauer presided over trial and entered the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255757 - 2020-03-04
State v. Mark R. Lowe
that because the arresting officer lacked probable cause to believe a crime had been committed, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3907 - 2005-03-31
that because the arresting officer lacked probable cause to believe a crime had been committed, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3907 - 2005-03-31
Wayne G. Tatge v. Chambers & Owen, Inc.
-appeals from the trial court's denial of its motion to remit damages and its alternative motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9862 - 2005-03-31
-appeals from the trial court's denial of its motion to remit damages and its alternative motion for a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9862 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the proceedings violated his due process rights and that he is entitled to a new trial. ¶2 This record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124790 - 2017-09-21
that the proceedings violated his due process rights and that he is entitled to a new trial. ¶2 This record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124790 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
of trial counsel; (2) the circuit court erred in failing to suppress statements he made to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34377 - 2014-09-15
of trial counsel; (2) the circuit court erred in failing to suppress statements he made to the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34377 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is entitled to a new trial because his counsel 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31319 - 2014-09-15
is entitled to a new trial because his counsel 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31319 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(2019-20),1 motion for a new trial. Liebzeit argues that the circuit court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365934 - 2021-05-11
(2019-20),1 motion for a new trial. Liebzeit argues that the circuit court erred by denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=365934 - 2021-05-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Blackshear moved for sentence modification because the trial court found her ineligible for the ERP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280122 - 2020-08-19
, Blackshear moved for sentence modification because the trial court found her ineligible for the ERP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=280122 - 2020-08-19

