Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24001 - 24010 of 64013 for records/1000.
Search results 24001 - 24010 of 64013 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
determination if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107969 - 2014-02-10
determination if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we can perceive a reasonable basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107969 - 2014-02-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484167 - 2022-02-16
reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484167 - 2022-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nos. 2016AP1841-CRNM 2016AP1842-CRNM 2 record, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181706 - 2017-09-21
. Nos. 2016AP1841-CRNM 2016AP1842-CRNM 2 record, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181706 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jewel C.
-correcting court” and reviews the record to address any alleged “errors” of the trial court. Cook v. Cook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
-correcting court” and reviews the record to address any alleged “errors” of the trial court. Cook v. Cook
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
State v. Cindy Lou Kusisto
on 3 separate occasions during that same period, which convictions remain of record and unreversed.” ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26
on 3 separate occasions during that same period, which convictions remain of record and unreversed.” ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25613 - 2006-06-26
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104911 - 2013-12-03
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104911 - 2013-12-03
[PDF]
State v. Jamie D. Jardine
years for reasons that cannot be determined from the record before this court. ¶4 In the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3725 - 2017-09-19
years for reasons that cannot be determined from the record before this court. ¶4 In the interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3725 - 2017-09-19
L'Wanda Warrendorf v. Donald Osborne
the record, the small claims court entered judgment against Rosacker for $388.64 plus costs. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12934 - 2005-03-31
the record, the small claims court entered judgment against Rosacker for $388.64 plus costs. The court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12934 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discretion when it applies the appropriate legal standards to “‘facts that are of record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215556 - 2018-07-11
discretion when it applies the appropriate legal standards to “‘facts that are of record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215556 - 2018-07-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595290 - 2022-11-29
. Having independently reviewed the entire record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595290 - 2022-11-29