Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24021 - 24030 of 51575 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

Robert M. v. City of Franklin
].” The City, believing it could perform the work properly and cost-effectively, decided to perform the work
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2619 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Anthony Harris
, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17025 - 2017-09-21

2006 WI APP 192
summary judgment in the Association’s favor. BACKGROUND I. The Ordinance ¶3 Effective February 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26177 - 2006-09-26

[PDF] Robert M. v. City of Franklin
did not effectively monitor the landscaping and filling work done by the Origers, and that this led
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2619 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Anthony Harris
, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17026 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 35
full, proper, and intended effect.’” State v. Braunschweig, 2018 WI 113, ¶12, 384 Wis. 2d 742, 921
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354164 - 2021-06-14

[PDF] WI APP 163
the cost of the work. The contract also provided that Matthew, the project manager, would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29384 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
] (including interest through the date of this Judgment, and fees, costs and disbursements billed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446325 - 2021-10-28

2007 WI APP 163
-construction services and $37,500 for construction services plus the cost of the work. The contract also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29384 - 2014-09-23

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - September 2020
. Fields, 565 U.S. 499, 507 (2012), effectively overruled the per se custody rule from State v. Armstrong
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286649 - 2020-09-08