Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2411 - 2420 of 29713 for des.
Search results 2411 - 2420 of 29713 for des.
State v. John W. Knoppe
de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13304 - 2005-03-31
de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673, 676, 478 N.W.2d 63, 65 (Ct. App. 1991). The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
information at sentencing.” State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶38, 389 Wis. 2d 627, 937 N.W.2d 579. We review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
information at sentencing.” State v. Coffee, 2020 WI 1, ¶38, 389 Wis. 2d 627, 937 N.W.2d 579. We review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993507 - 2025-08-07
2010 WI APP 16
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45061 - 2010-01-26
judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Hardy v. Hoefferle, 2007 WI App 264, ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45061 - 2010-01-26
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we consider de novo. Landwehr v. Landwehr, 2006 WI 64, ¶8, 291 Wis. 2d 49, 715 N.W.2d 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39276 - 2009-08-11
is a question of law we consider de novo. Landwehr v. Landwehr, 2006 WI 64, ¶8, 291 Wis. 2d 49, 715 N.W.2d 180
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39276 - 2009-08-11
COURT OF APPEALS
, that Hill’s statement would not raise a reasonable doubt at trial about Johnson’s guilt. Our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64240 - 2011-05-16
, that Hill’s statement would not raise a reasonable doubt at trial about Johnson’s guilt. Our review is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64240 - 2011-05-16
COURT OF APPEALS
this issue is de minimus, given the significant marital income at the time of divorce.[7] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52029 - 2010-07-12
this issue is de minimus, given the significant marital income at the time of divorce.[7] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52029 - 2010-07-12
[PDF]
Nipulchandra Patel v. Robert J. Bukowski
claim. We review the trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11742 - 2017-09-20
claim. We review the trial court’s grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11742 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review the sufficiency of the defendant’s allegations de novo, based on the four corners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71879 - 2014-09-15
. We review the sufficiency of the defendant’s allegations de novo, based on the four corners
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71879 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brian Scott Nooyen v. Bonita June Nooyen
Nooyen moved for de novo review. ¶4 At the de novo hearing, Brian testified that before he filed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18097 - 2017-09-21
Nooyen moved for de novo review. ¶4 At the de novo hearing, Brian testified that before he filed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18097 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59638 - 2014-09-15
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59638 - 2014-09-15