Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2411 - 2420 of 20373 for sai.
Search results 2411 - 2420 of 20373 for sai.
State v. John T. Miller
"hiatus" between the officer's notice of suspension and actual suspension, the State says that Miller's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10763 - 2005-03-31
"hiatus" between the officer's notice of suspension and actual suspension, the State says that Miller's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10763 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin M. Dudek
attorney told him that he should never submit to any tests. Trooper Paine then says here is a phone—here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26240 - 2006-08-22
attorney told him that he should never submit to any tests. Trooper Paine then says here is a phone—here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26240 - 2006-08-22
[PDF]
State v. Daniel R. French
responding, “no,” French immediately asked, “well, what happens if I say no?” The officer answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6614 - 2017-09-19
responding, “no,” French immediately asked, “well, what happens if I say no?” The officer answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6614 - 2017-09-19
State v. Charles Patterson
, Patterson says, the legislature has made it plain that, whether or not a delinquency adjudication may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31
, Patterson says, the legislature has made it plain that, whether or not a delinquency adjudication may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that, without the video, it was the officer’s word against Schmidt’s, “with [the officer] saying Schmidt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
that, without the video, it was the officer’s word against Schmidt’s, “with [the officer] saying Schmidt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121951 - 2014-09-18
Dodge Co. Department of Human Services v. Rachel W.
in some document. Nor did the trial court say that if a person with personal knowledge made a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3193 - 2005-03-31
in some document. Nor did the trial court say that if a person with personal knowledge made a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3193 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
denied his motion, saying Hoeft had not shown he had contacted the warden. ¶5 Hoeft’s trial was April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26638 - 2014-09-15
denied his motion, saying Hoeft had not shown he had contacted the warden. ¶5 Hoeft’s trial was April
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26638 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
or asked her” or indicated “she was aware of what we were saying [or whether she knew us].” Margaret’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48630 - 2010-04-05
or asked her” or indicated “she was aware of what we were saying [or whether she knew us].” Margaret’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48630 - 2010-04-05
County of Fond du Lac v. Melissa M. Wondra Tarrant
to be the most helpful to your client, but we don’t need three people all saying that Ms. Wondra-Tarrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6436 - 2005-03-31
to be the most helpful to your client, but we don’t need three people all saying that Ms. Wondra-Tarrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6436 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), for example, the supreme court observed: “We are not saying that strict responsibility misrepresentations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78237 - 2014-09-15
), for example, the supreme court observed: “We are not saying that strict responsibility misrepresentations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78237 - 2014-09-15