Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24121 - 24130 of 30001 for de.
Search results 24121 - 24130 of 30001 for de.
State v. Mark A. Flagstadt
reviews independently. Id. Despite our de novo standard of review, we hasten to add that we value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5585 - 2005-03-31
reviews independently. Id. Despite our de novo standard of review, we hasten to add that we value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5585 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798395 - 2024-05-07
the facts satisfy the statutory standard is a question of law that we review de novo.” Waukesha County v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798395 - 2024-05-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law reviewed de novo. See State v. Brandt, 226 Wis. 2d 610, 618, 594 N.W.2d 759 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995770 - 2025-08-21
is a question of law reviewed de novo. See State v. Brandt, 226 Wis. 2d 610, 618, 594 N.W.2d 759 (1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995770 - 2025-08-21
WI App 56 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1753-CR 2013AP1754-CR ...
on this statutory-interpretation appeal is de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis. 2d 191, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111193 - 2014-05-27
on this statutory-interpretation appeal is de novo. See Village of Shorewood v. Steinberg, 174 Wis. 2d 191, 201
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111193 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
Liturgical Publications, Inc. v. Steven P. Karides
. No. 2004AP478 3 a trial court’s decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24770 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2004AP478 3 a trial court’s decision granting summary judgment de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24770 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. We review this question de novo and “consider the evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868500 - 2024-10-29
. We review this question de novo and “consider the evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=868500 - 2024-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the evidence is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210186 - 2018-03-27
of the evidence is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Smith, 2012 WI 91, ¶24, 342 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210186 - 2018-03-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶5 Our review of an order granting a motion to dismiss a complaint is de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29320 - 2014-09-15
. ¶5 Our review of an order granting a motion to dismiss a complaint is de novo. State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29320 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Wilcox, 355 Wis. 2d 1, ¶15. In other words, accepting as true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209509 - 2018-03-08
of law that we review de novo. Wilcox, 355 Wis. 2d 1, ¶15. In other words, accepting as true
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209509 - 2018-03-08
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the gravity with which this court views judicial misconduct." Id., ¶39. We impose discipline on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240910 - 2019-05-21
the gravity with which this court views judicial misconduct." Id., ¶39. We impose discipline on a de
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240910 - 2019-05-21