Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24141 - 24150 of 57351 for id.
Search results 24141 - 24150 of 57351 for id.
2007 WI APP 154
its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning. See id. We interpret the language of the regulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28868 - 2007-06-26
its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning. See id. We interpret the language of the regulation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28868 - 2007-06-26
State v. David L. Wiener
, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time. Id. at 689. Strategic choices made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9170 - 2005-03-31
, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel's perspective at the time. Id. at 689. Strategic choices made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9170 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rational process and reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.’” Id. (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76796 - 2014-09-15
rational process and reached a conclusion that a reasonable judge could reach.’” Id. (quoted source
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76796 - 2014-09-15
State v. Herman L. Richardson
cases. See id. This test is an objective standard of reasonableness. See id. at 688. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16199 - 2005-03-31
cases. See id. This test is an objective standard of reasonableness. See id. at 688. We need
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16199 - 2005-03-31
Mark D. Petrowsky v. Robert W. Henkel
, however, presents a question of law which we review de novo. Id. In an adverse possession case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12123 - 2005-03-31
, however, presents a question of law which we review de novo. Id. In an adverse possession case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12123 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey J. Czerniak
constitutes a new factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5876 - 2005-03-31
constitutes a new factor presents a legal issue which we decide de novo. Id. Whether a new factor justifies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5876 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2007 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of ...
with battery but the trial judge amended the charge sua sponte to disorderly conduct. Id. We reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30872 - 2007-11-13
with battery but the trial judge amended the charge sua sponte to disorderly conduct. Id. We reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30872 - 2007-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in determining a statute’s meaning. Id., ¶46. Thus, “statutory language is interpreted in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
in determining a statute’s meaning. Id., ¶46. Thus, “statutory language is interpreted in the context
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=801205 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Id., ¶21. The circuit court’s duty at issue here is the duty to “[d]etermine the extent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230662 - 2018-12-11
. Id., ¶21. The circuit court’s duty at issue here is the duty to “[d]etermine the extent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230662 - 2018-12-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Id. A defendant who moves for resentencing on the ground that the circuit court relied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522359 - 2022-05-17
. Id. A defendant who moves for resentencing on the ground that the circuit court relied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522359 - 2022-05-17