Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24261 - 24270 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 24261 - 24270 of 61139 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. David S. Leighton
of counsel claim.[7] With respect to adjournment requests by his second attorney, Leighton argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16075 - 2005-03-31
of counsel claim.[7] With respect to adjournment requests by his second attorney, Leighton argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16075 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tony G. Longmire
motion. Longmire claims the amount of restitution ordered is excessive because he was denied an offset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31
motion. Longmire claims the amount of restitution ordered is excessive because he was denied an offset
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6129 - 2005-03-31
Robert Hoskins v. Dodge County
County and the City of Beaver Dam. Hoskins claims the trial court erred in concluding that the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3773 - 2005-03-31
County and the City of Beaver Dam. Hoskins claims the trial court erred in concluding that the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3773 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David S. Leighton
9 ineffective assistance of counsel claim.7 With respect to adjournment requests by his second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16075 - 2017-09-21
9 ineffective assistance of counsel claim.7 With respect to adjournment requests by his second
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16075 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Tony G. Longmire
No. 03-0300-CR 2 appeals the court’s order denying his postconviction motion. Longmire claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6129 - 2017-09-19
No. 03-0300-CR 2 appeals the court’s order denying his postconviction motion. Longmire claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6129 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. On the merits of Dryja’s mandamus claim, we conclude that Dryja is entitled to mandamus relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757697 - 2024-03-14
. On the merits of Dryja’s mandamus claim, we conclude that Dryja is entitled to mandamus relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=757697 - 2024-03-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Brown- Troop alleges multiple instances of ineffective assistance from trial counsel and he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217134 - 2018-08-07
. Brown- Troop alleges multiple instances of ineffective assistance from trial counsel and he claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217134 - 2018-08-07
[PDF]
WI APP 104
discrimination claim was time barred because it was not filed within 300 days after the alleged discrimination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121632 - 2014-11-11
discrimination claim was time barred because it was not filed within 300 days after the alleged discrimination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121632 - 2014-11-11
WI App 104 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2014AP13 Complete Title of ...
discrimination claim was time barred because it was not filed within 300 days after the alleged discrimination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121632 - 2014-10-28
discrimination claim was time barred because it was not filed within 300 days after the alleged discrimination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121632 - 2014-10-28
Frontsheet
] The plaintiffs' complaint alleges several claims for relief against Steven that are premised upon his intentional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33435 - 2008-07-15
] The plaintiffs' complaint alleges several claims for relief against Steven that are premised upon his intentional
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33435 - 2008-07-15