Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24381 - 24390 of 46138 for paternity test paper work.

Douglas Goeb v.
in one of the estates on which he was working and that he had submitted a false acknowledgement
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17096 - 2012-05-09

Eric S. Brunner v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
There was no dispute that Brunner injured his back while working at Burger King in January 1995, and that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15687 - 2005-03-31

[PDF]
university research program, and that this work, which predated Krupenkin’s patent filings, had occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=999289 - 2025-08-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
Ward, engaged in law work activities for Attorney Strouse's firm that are customarily performed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770391 - 2024-02-27

[PDF] WI App 6
motorist. Because he was working at the time of the accident, Mani submitted a claim to his employer’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1064859 - 2026-03-24

[PDF] State v. Kristoffer A. Ashmore
-CR 6 ¶11 The test for ineffective assistance of counsel has two elements: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14865 - 2017-09-21

State v. Thomas G. Henkel
performance was not deficient on this point. The test for deficient performance is whether counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3194 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeremy J. Schlitt
in the Strickland test. The second prong asks whether “counsel’s errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9178 - 2005-03-31

State v. Reno D. Coffin
There is a two-pronged test for ineffective assistance of counsel that the defendant is required to prove: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7298 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Governor Evers' Response to Respondents' Motion for Reconsideration of January 11, 2024 Order
that “[e]xperts must be put to the test of cross-examination.” (Resp’ts’ Second Mot. for Recons. 4
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012624eversresponse.pdf - 2024-01-26