Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24401 - 24410 of 82885 for case search.
Search results 24401 - 24410 of 82885 for case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
was not assigned to the case and the order was based on the false premise that Emily had been discharged. Emily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29416 - 2007-06-18
was not assigned to the case and the order was based on the false premise that Emily had been discharged. Emily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29416 - 2007-06-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 948.075(1r) and the application of “a computerized communication system” to the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
. § 948.075(1r) and the application of “a computerized communication system” to the facts of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79461 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to reopen the case and amend the judgment to non-criminal first-offense OWI, conceding the case should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174756 - 2017-09-21
to reopen the case and amend the judgment to non-criminal first-offense OWI, conceding the case should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174756 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 3
2008 WI 3 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP1036-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31515 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI 3 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2006AP1036-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31515 - 2014-09-15
Certification
809.61 (2007-08)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46161 - 2010-01-26
809.61 (2007-08)[1] this court certifies the appeal in this case to the Wisconsin Supreme Court for its
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46161 - 2010-01-26
[PDF]
State v. Bruce N. Brown
. No. 2003AP3252 3 The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20456 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2003AP3252 3 The facts or data in the particular case upon which an expert bases an opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20456 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the original complaint.”[3] The court also addressed some of the trial testimony in the case and concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139718 - 2015-04-14
of the original complaint.”[3] The court also addressed some of the trial testimony in the case and concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139718 - 2015-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the loan has been current since November 1, 2011. ¶4 There is only one issue in this case: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92707 - 2013-02-12
and that the loan has been current since November 1, 2011. ¶4 There is only one issue in this case: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92707 - 2013-02-12
Ronald W. Morters v. Charles H. Barr and TIG Insurance Company
. I. Background. ¶2 The facts of this case have been summarized by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7383 - 2005-03-31
. I. Background. ¶2 The facts of this case have been summarized by this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7383 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Michael L.W. appeals from a postdispositional order in a juvenile case directing that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29037 - 2007-05-15
NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Michael L.W. appeals from a postdispositional order in a juvenile case directing that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29037 - 2007-05-15