Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24401 - 24410 of 58492 for speedy trial.

[PDF] State v. Patrick Wolfe
) withdraw his guilty plea based upon a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel; and (2) modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3548 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
failed to establish a sufficient factual basis for his plea and that his trial counsel provided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1020949 - 2025-10-09

[PDF] Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v. Bor-Mor, Inc.
considering all the evidence, and that the trial court improperly allowed the jury to focus on Frankenmuth’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6686 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] M. Susan Churchill v. WFA Econometrics Corporation
) whether the trial court should have changed the punitive damage award to zero; (4) whether the verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4916 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the trial court erred in denying two motions to suppress evidence seized from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78531 - 2014-09-15

State v. Anthony H.
to be followed by forty years on probation. He claims that evidentiary rulings by the trial court deprived him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15295 - 2005-03-31

2009 WI APP 146
] Because we conclude that the trial court erred when it found ambiguity in the document creating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40489 - 2009-10-27

State v. Beth E. Zurkowski
) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the instruction; and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4845 - 2005-03-31

State v. Dorian B. Stock
) trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the instruction; and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4844 - 2005-03-31

Steven Burnett v. Claude Hill
), Stats., must be authenticated to acquire personal jurisdiction over a defendant. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7991 - 2005-03-31