Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24431 - 24440 of 58277 for speedy trial.

State v. John E. Lowther III
no contest to the battery charge, and the trial court dismissed two other misdemeanor charges at the request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10984 - 2005-03-31

Robert F. Nagel v. State
that Nagel did not violate § 971.25(2), and therefore reverse. The day before trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7833 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Stanley A.N.
with a three-year-old child. He argues that the trial judge exceeded his authority to interrogate witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9867 - 2017-09-19

State v. Stanley A.N.
with a three-year-old child. He argues that the trial judge exceeded his authority to interrogate witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9867 - 2005-03-31

Claudia I. v. John F.M.
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Claudia I. appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing a paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14078 - 2005-03-31

State v. Johnny Lee Griffin
Griffin appeals an order entered by the trial court denying his motion for a return of the victim witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13555 - 2005-03-31

Claudia C. Kalous v. Richard Kalous
-sufficient. The trial court had the power to alter stipulated maintenance for changed circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12685 - 2005-03-31

State v. Raymond T. Golden
. The no merit report first addresses the question of effective assistance of trial counsel. While no Machner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9901 - 2005-03-31

Paul J. May v. Pecatonica Rail Transit Commission
. The trial court dismissed with prejudice, because the appellants admittedly failed to comply with § 893.80
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9188 - 2005-03-31

City of Milwaukee v. Jerome Thornton
of proceeding to foreclose tax lien by petition for judgment). The trial court held a hearing on January 12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7355 - 2005-03-31