Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24461 - 24470 of 30247 for de.
Search results 24461 - 24470 of 30247 for de.
State v. Dennis H. Murphy
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 There is no dispute here that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6612 - 2005-03-31
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. ¶8 There is no dispute here that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6612 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
is a constitutional issue that we review de novo. Id. “A defendant who requests resentencing due to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33656 - 2014-09-15
is a constitutional issue that we review de novo. Id. “A defendant who requests resentencing due to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33656 - 2014-09-15
WI App 152 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2553-CR Complete Titl...
. However, we review the [trial] court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72012 - 2013-04-23
. However, we review the [trial] court’s application of constitutional principles to the findings of fact de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72012 - 2013-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional protection against double jeopardy is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32170 - 2008-03-19
the constitutional protection against double jeopardy is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32170 - 2008-03-19
[PDF]
WI 95
of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 71
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41756 - 2014-09-15
of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Inglimo, 2007 WI 126, ¶5, 305 Wis. 2d 71
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41756 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 77
. Fouts appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Waters by Murphy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114813 - 2017-09-21
. Fouts appeals. DISCUSSION ¶10 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. See Waters by Murphy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114813 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Calvin Pluim
cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we give “great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
cause determination is not de novo, even though it presents a question of law; rather, we give “great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15225 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mark A. Flagstadt
reviews independently. Id. Despite our de novo standard of review, we hasten to add that we value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5585 - 2005-03-31
reviews independently. Id. Despite our de novo standard of review, we hasten to add that we value
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5585 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 27, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
became a valid and enforceable contract under Wis. Stat. § 706.02 is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27594 - 2006-12-26
became a valid and enforceable contract under Wis. Stat. § 706.02 is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27594 - 2006-12-26
State v. Roger P. Barber
is a question of law which we review de novo under the admitted state of the facts. See State v. Ziegenhagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11894 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which we review de novo under the admitted state of the facts. See State v. Ziegenhagen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11894 - 2005-03-31