Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2451 - 2460 of 5437 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu besi double plat Aesesa Kabupaten Nagekeo Nusa Tenggara Timur.

State v. Michael J. Whipp
for first-degree sexual assault of a child and incest with a child present a double jeopardy problem because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12537 - 2005-03-31

State v. Wyatt Daniel Henning
that Henning’s double jeopardy protections bar a remand for a new trial. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5255 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
(for calculation of double damages pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 100.20(5)[7] based upon the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28962 - 2007-06-26

[PDF] NOTICE
, and double damages under WIS. STAT. § 704.27 from November 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007. The court also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36185 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Roger P. Barber
crimes, his constitutional right against double jeopardy would be violated if he were retried
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13447 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. Robert B. Kliesmet
a Rule 60(b)(5) motion to modify the consent decree in order to allow double bunking of inmates.[7
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17142 - 2005-03-31

Alexander L. Jacobus v. State
for purposes of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Specifically, in Nelson, the defendant contended he could
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16966 - 2005-09-12

[PDF] Lynn Boxhorn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
offer of settlement, double costs and interest should have been allowed. We affirm the judgment except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7873 - 2017-09-19

2007 WI APP 225
because it would constitute impermissible double credit against two nonconcurrent sentences. Rohl, 160
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30370 - 2007-10-30

Thomas W. Nelson v. John L. McLaughlin
against Mutual Service in the amount of $100,000, together with double taxable costs and disbursements
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17072 - 2005-03-31