Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24561 - 24570 of 64991 for or b.
Search results 24561 - 24570 of 64991 for or b.
[PDF]
Rules petition 09-07 supporting memo
of the following circumstances: (a) When authorized or required to do so by statute. (b) On the motion
/supreme/docs/0907petitionamendsupport.pdf - 2010-01-20
of the following circumstances: (a) When authorized or required to do so by statute. (b) On the motion
/supreme/docs/0907petitionamendsupport.pdf - 2010-01-20
[PDF]
Supreme Court Rule petition 14-01 supporting memo
…………………………………..………………………………5 B. Definition
/supreme/docs/1401petitionsupport.pdf - 2014-01-22
…………………………………..………………………………5 B. Definition
/supreme/docs/1401petitionsupport.pdf - 2014-01-22
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - December 2013
v. Sarfraz This case examines Wis. Stat. § 972.11(2)(b)1, a provision in the state’s Rape
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105685 - 2017-09-21
v. Sarfraz This case examines Wis. Stat. § 972.11(2)(b)1, a provision in the state’s Rape
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105685 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARSHALL B. MURRAY, Judge. Affirmed. Nos. 2024AP859
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833642 - 2024-08-05
of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARSHALL B. MURRAY, Judge. Affirmed. Nos. 2024AP859
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=833642 - 2024-08-05
State v. Joseph P.
§ 905.04(4)(b). Reacting to Joseph's argument that there were no such orders, the trial court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9674 - 2005-03-31
§ 905.04(4)(b). Reacting to Joseph's argument that there were no such orders, the trial court noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9674 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or treatment and the alternatives” or (b) substantially incapable “of applying an understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753847 - 2024-01-24
or treatment and the alternatives” or (b) substantially incapable “of applying an understanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=753847 - 2024-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Alexander R. Armstrong
trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to seek severance. B. The error in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to seek severance. B. The error in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5161 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Marshall B. Murray presided over the jury trial, entered the orders terminating Richard’s and Michelle’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878773 - 2024-11-19
Marshall B. Murray presided over the jury trial, entered the orders terminating Richard’s and Michelle’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878773 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Randall S. Handeland
that the trial court 1 Circuit Judge Angela B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12994 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court 1 Circuit Judge Angela B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12994 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Loren L. Leiser
. § 948.03(2)(b); and one count of exposing a child to harmful material, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.11(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2108 - 2017-09-19
. § 948.03(2)(b); and one count of exposing a child to harmful material, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 948.11(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2108 - 2017-09-19