Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24571 - 24580 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 24571 - 24580 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Armando Salinas
he made to the police should not have been admitted at trial because the State failed to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2399 - 2005-03-31
he made to the police should not have been admitted at trial because the State failed to show that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2399 - 2005-03-31
State v. Romel Anton Taylor
a judgment of conviction and the trial court “Order Granting Motion for Sentence Credit in Part.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10884 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction and the trial court “Order Granting Motion for Sentence Credit in Part.” He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10884 - 2005-03-31
Willmer Guillaume v. Larry Elvetici
1976 vehicle. Because we conclude that the trial court applied the incorrect burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7308 - 2005-03-31
1976 vehicle. Because we conclude that the trial court applied the incorrect burden of proof
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7308 - 2005-03-31
State v. Julian D. Pope
from a judgment convicting him of possessing cocaine with intent to deliver it. At Pope’s jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14925 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment convicting him of possessing cocaine with intent to deliver it. At Pope’s jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14925 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey J. Ward
for not challenging the sentence. Because the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion and Ward can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3138 - 2005-03-31
for not challenging the sentence. Because the trial court properly exercised its sentencing discretion and Ward can
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3138 - 2005-03-31
Chippewa Valley Country Festival v. Little Black Mutual Insurance Company
. Little Black argues that the trial court erred by concluding that its policy covered Chippewa Valley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3847 - 2005-03-31
. Little Black argues that the trial court erred by concluding that its policy covered Chippewa Valley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3847 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
while intoxicated. His conviction followed a bench trial. He contends that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30826 - 2014-09-15
while intoxicated. His conviction followed a bench trial. He contends that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30826 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to trial and the jury returned guilty verdicts as to each count. On the three counts of child abuse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854231 - 2024-09-26
to trial and the jury returned guilty verdicts as to each count. On the three counts of child abuse
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854231 - 2024-09-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
of conviction or order a new trial. We conclude that Rhodes’s claims are procedurally barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30086 - 2014-09-15
of conviction or order a new trial. We conclude that Rhodes’s claims are procedurally barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30086 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Amendment rights were violated because the trial judge in one of the matters was “gross[ly] incompeten[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26
Amendment rights were violated because the trial judge in one of the matters was “gross[ly] incompeten[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49296 - 2010-04-26