Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24641 - 24650 of 45022 for WA 0852 2611 9277 [[GLORION]] Vendor Kitchen Set Lazada Custom Aston Bogor.
Search results 24641 - 24650 of 45022 for WA 0852 2611 9277 [[GLORION]] Vendor Kitchen Set Lazada Custom Aston Bogor.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
withheld Waits’ sentence and he was placed on probation for two years. A restitution hearing was set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054854 - 2025-12-23
withheld Waits’ sentence and he was placed on probation for two years. A restitution hearing was set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054854 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
State v. Tronnie M. Dismuke
to prison, and the circuit court imposed "applicable . . . costs." The judgment of conviction set costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17529 - 2017-09-21
to prison, and the circuit court imposed "applicable . . . costs." The judgment of conviction set costs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17529 - 2017-09-21
State v. Perry A. Felton
. Felton attended with his lawyer a pretrial conference, during which a jury trial was set for October 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6831 - 2005-03-31
. Felton attended with his lawyer a pretrial conference, during which a jury trial was set for October 15
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6831 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 173
). In that setting, it makes sense that the extended supervision statute does not ask a court to predict a future
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29398 - 2014-09-15
). In that setting, it makes sense that the extended supervision statute does not ask a court to predict a future
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29398 - 2014-09-15
State v. Francis P. Hughes
of Livingston would serve none of the purposes” set out in the opinion in that case. We disagree and conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2721 - 2005-03-31
of Livingston would serve none of the purposes” set out in the opinion in that case. We disagree and conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2721 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the application of prior case law to the set of undisputed facts presented.” Id. ¶12 Dengel brought his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
the application of prior case law to the set of undisputed facts presented.” Id. ¶12 Dengel brought his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100148 - 2013-07-29
State v. Mayfield Pennington
of discretion. See State v. Lindh, 161 Wis. 2d 324, 348‑49, 468 N.W.2d 168 (1991). The trial court should set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16273 - 2005-03-31
of discretion. See State v. Lindh, 161 Wis. 2d 324, 348‑49, 468 N.W.2d 168 (1991). The trial court should set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16273 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
. Stat. § 281.11). The court of appeals applied the test for preemption set forth in DeRosso Landfill Co
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67354 - 2011-07-05
. Stat. § 281.11). The court of appeals applied the test for preemption set forth in DeRosso Landfill Co
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67354 - 2011-07-05
COURT OF APPEALS
and explainable basis.” Id., ¶39 (citation and one set of quotation marks omitted). When we review a sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60992 - 2011-03-14
and explainable basis.” Id., ¶39 (citation and one set of quotation marks omitted). When we review a sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60992 - 2011-03-14
COURT OF APPEALS
of Review ¶12 In reviewing a circuit court’s findings of fact, we will not set aside the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89358 - 2012-11-14
of Review ¶12 In reviewing a circuit court’s findings of fact, we will not set aside the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89358 - 2012-11-14