Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2471 - 2480 of 14741 for ag.

Robert E. Williams v. Gwen A. Bradle-Williams
the judgment. The parties were married in July 1991. Gwen, age forty-two, earned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8928 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the termination of parental rights to A.J.H., a person under the age of 17: State of Wisconsin v. R. B. (L.C
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211962 - 2018-04-25

[PDF] NOTICE
estate to Megan, unless Schunk died before she reached age eighteen.1 In that event, the bulk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35926 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
of the committed person’s age. Although she disagreed with placing offenders in subgroups like the high-risk group
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=87423 - 2012-09-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for first-degree sexual assault of a child under the age of thirteen and manufacturing THC. Baker
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108438 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] County of Fond du Lac v. Kevin C. Derksen
. The officer determined that Derksen had not reached Wisconsin’s legal drinking age, and he issued Derksen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6492 - 2017-09-19

State v. Richard H. Heuer, Jr.
with a person under the age of sixteen. Heuer contends that the trial court erred by refusing to permit him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11845 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
-three. They had two children from the marriage, ages twelve and ten. The trial court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28732 - 2007-04-17

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
: The complaint alleges that you engaged in sexual intercourse with someone, K.K.M., who had not attained the age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26856 - 2006-10-18

[PDF] State v. Dean C. Trepanier
“simply because of his age.” Trepanier filed a postconviction motion challenging the court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26060 - 2017-09-21