Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24781 - 24790 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 24781 - 24790 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
the motion, explaining that it was “conclusory in all respects,” and procedurally barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30604 - 2014-09-15
the motion, explaining that it was “conclusory in all respects,” and procedurally barred by State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30604 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion to modify maintenance. Frank additionally appeals an order finding him in contempt of court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29871 - 2014-09-15
motion to modify maintenance. Frank additionally appeals an order finding him in contempt of court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29871 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Jefferson County v. Jesse A. Marcelle
the court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4053 - 2017-09-20
the court erred in denying his motions to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol content
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4053 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Nate Wilson
., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Nate Wilson appeals pro se from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4036 - 2017-09-20
., Anderson and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Nate Wilson appeals pro se from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4036 - 2017-09-20
Christopher Sean English v. Malec Holdings II, Ltd.
of service in support of the motion for default judgment was insufficient. The Englishes argue that proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18623 - 2005-06-21
of service in support of the motion for default judgment was insufficient. The Englishes argue that proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18623 - 2005-06-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, appeals from an order of the circuit court denying his motion for sentence modification and from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90116 - 2012-12-10
, appeals from an order of the circuit court denying his motion for sentence modification and from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90116 - 2012-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849221 - 2024-09-18
postconviction motion. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2021
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=849221 - 2024-09-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Frederick L. Martin, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31343 - 2014-09-15
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Frederick L. Martin, pro se, appeals from an order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Assessment/Taxes.” The order also granted Star Prairie’s motion for frivolous sanctions against Slocum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182430 - 2017-09-21
Assessment/Taxes.” The order also granted Star Prairie’s motion for frivolous sanctions against Slocum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182430 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. Charles Blunt appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion. Blunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27037 - 2006-11-06
. Charles Blunt appeals pro se from an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2003-04)[1] motion. Blunt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27037 - 2006-11-06