Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2481 - 2490 of 29817 for des.
Search results 2481 - 2490 of 29817 for des.
2009 WI APP 68
, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137–138, 456
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36095 - 2009-05-26
, however, is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Richardson, 156 Wis. 2d 128, 137–138, 456
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36095 - 2009-05-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
counsel. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158237 - 2017-09-21
counsel. Sufficiency of the motion is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Allen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158237 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Timothy Wrase v. City of Neenah
agreed with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
agreed with the Wrases. The City of Neenah sought a trial de novo. The circuit court first noted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13316 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
afforded an agency determination: great weight deference, due weight deference, or de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207571 - 2018-01-25
afforded an agency determination: great weight deference, due weight deference, or de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207571 - 2018-01-25
Casanova Retail Liquor Store, Inc. v. State
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9079 - 2005-03-31
. Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9079 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
information, and ordered Jeremy to pay Della $420 in attorney fees. ¶6 Jeremy sought a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233256 - 2019-01-24
information, and ordered Jeremy to pay Della $420 in attorney fees. ¶6 Jeremy sought a hearing de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233256 - 2019-01-24
Chippewa County v. Julie L.
construction is de novo,[3] this court agrees with the trial court’s interpretation. Nothing in ch. 51, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14050 - 2005-03-31
construction is de novo,[3] this court agrees with the trial court’s interpretation. Nothing in ch. 51, Stats
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14050 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles G. Campbell
been suppressed is de novo. See id. (application of facts to constitutional principles presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7257 - 2005-03-31
been suppressed is de novo. See id. (application of facts to constitutional principles presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7257 - 2005-03-31
State v. David J.M.
meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13881 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53, ¶11, 280 Wis. 2d 68, 695 N.W.2d 315. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85627 - 2012-07-31
that we review de novo. State v. Reed, 2005 WI 53, ¶11, 280 Wis. 2d 68, 695 N.W.2d 315. This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85627 - 2012-07-31