Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24811 - 24820 of 83945 for case search.
Search results 24811 - 24820 of 83945 for case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to reopen the case and amend the judgment to non-criminal first-offense OWI, conceding the case should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174756 - 2017-09-21
to reopen the case and amend the judgment to non-criminal first-offense OWI, conceding the case should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174756 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of the original complaint.”[3] The court also addressed some of the trial testimony in the case and concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139718 - 2015-04-14
of the original complaint.”[3] The court also addressed some of the trial testimony in the case and concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139718 - 2015-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS
and that the loan has been current since November 1, 2011. ¶4 There is only one issue in this case: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92707 - 2013-02-12
and that the loan has been current since November 1, 2011. ¶4 There is only one issue in this case: whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92707 - 2013-02-12
Sarah Reed v. General Casualty Co. of WI
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2371
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11284 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-2371
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11284 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261083 - 2020-05-19
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261083 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that these cases are Nos. 2014AP2833-CR 2014AP2834-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165379 - 2017-09-21
and record, we conclude at conference that these cases are Nos. 2014AP2833-CR 2014AP2834-CR 2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165379 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390771 - 2021-07-14
.” Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390771 - 2021-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
) and the application of “a computerized communication system” to the facts of this case, which are questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
) and the application of “a computerized communication system” to the facts of this case, which are questions of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79461 - 2012-03-14
[PDF]
Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Lucille S.
discovery, several pretrial conferences and Lucille’s waiver of the time limits, the cases were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3920 - 2017-09-20
discovery, several pretrial conferences and Lucille’s waiver of the time limits, the cases were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3920 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
from two separate circuit court cases. On February 6, 2017, Johnson was charged in Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098837 - 2026-03-31
from two separate circuit court cases. On February 6, 2017, Johnson was charged in Milwaukee County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1098837 - 2026-03-31