Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24871 - 24880 of 29721 for des.

State v. Erik Gracia
and prejudiced the defendant are questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 236-37. Counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4710 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was prejudicial are questions of law that we review de novo. State v. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d 121, 128, 449 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192134 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Clark County Department of Human Services v. Antonia R.
review de novo. In re Jason P.S., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862, 537 N.W.2d 45 (Ct. App. 1995). Presumably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7605 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI APP 27
on the brief of David J. Matyas, guardian ad litem, De Pere. 2023 WI App 27 COURT OF APPEALS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=645837 - 2023-06-12

2009 WI App 22
they are clearly erroneous. Second, we review the application of constitutional principles to those facts de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34839 - 2009-02-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
territorial jurisdiction presents a question of law that we review de novo, Randle, 252 Wis. 2d 743, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208408 - 2018-02-13

State v. Tony M. Smith
determination of whether counsel's performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8414 - 2005-03-31

Mary A. Cruz v. All Saints Healthcare System, Inc.
action is a matter of statutory interpretation, which is a question of law subject to our de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2651 - 2005-03-31

State v. Julie Ann Quinn
review de novo. See State v. Martin, 156 Wis.2d 399, 402, 456 N.W.2d 892, 894 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13629 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 24, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of ...
). This is a question of law that we review de novo. See Plude, 310 Wis. 2d 28, ¶33. ¶8 According to Keith’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64622 - 2011-05-23