Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24961 - 24970 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 24961 - 24970 of 58492 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
was not preserved at trial, but explicitly declines to argue ineffective assistance of counsel, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56874 - 2014-09-15
was not preserved at trial, but explicitly declines to argue ineffective assistance of counsel, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56874 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
investigation report (PSI) on which the trial court relied was biased. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4657 - 2017-09-19
investigation report (PSI) on which the trial court relied was biased. We reject these arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4657 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that his trial and appellate counsel were deficient by failing to recognize the defect in the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215143 - 2018-06-29
that his trial and appellate counsel were deficient by failing to recognize the defect in the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215143 - 2018-06-29
[PDF]
State v. John Konaha
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Konaha argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5740 - 2017-09-19
denying his motion for postconviction relief. Konaha argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5740 - 2017-09-19
State v. Gabriel L. Zitlow
of marijuana as a party to the crime. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4009 - 2005-03-31
of marijuana as a party to the crime. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4009 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in its entirety and remand the case to the trial court for an award of appellate attorney fees pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90775 - 2012-12-18
in its entirety and remand the case to the trial court for an award of appellate attorney fees pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90775 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
B&D Contractors, Inc. v. Arwin Window Systems, Inc.
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing its claim against Transcontinental Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25250 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing its claim against Transcontinental Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25250 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether Buntrock is entitled to reversal of the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32983 - 2008-06-10
is whether Buntrock is entitled to reversal of the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32983 - 2008-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
).[1] The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it denied Reynosa’s pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
).[1] The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it denied Reynosa’s pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James H. Dumke
pursuant to the Board’s complaint. ¶8 In August 1996, less than two months prior to trial scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17471 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to the Board’s complaint. ¶8 In August 1996, less than two months prior to trial scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17471 - 2005-03-31