Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 24961 - 24970 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 24961 - 24970 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Gabriel L. Zitlow
of marijuana as a party to the crime. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4009 - 2005-03-31
of marijuana as a party to the crime. He contends that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4009 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in its entirety and remand the case to the trial court for an award of appellate attorney fees pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90775 - 2012-12-18
in its entirety and remand the case to the trial court for an award of appellate attorney fees pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90775 - 2012-12-18
[PDF]
B&D Contractors, Inc. v. Arwin Window Systems, Inc.
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing its claim against Transcontinental Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25250 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing its claim against Transcontinental Insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25250 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
is whether Buntrock is entitled to reversal of the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32983 - 2008-06-10
is whether Buntrock is entitled to reversal of the trial court’s order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32983 - 2008-06-10
COURT OF APPEALS
).[1] The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it denied Reynosa’s pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
).[1] The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred when it denied Reynosa’s pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39222 - 2009-08-10
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. James H. Dumke
pursuant to the Board’s complaint. ¶8 In August 1996, less than two months prior to trial scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17471 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to the Board’s complaint. ¶8 In August 1996, less than two months prior to trial scheduled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17471 - 2005-03-31
State v. Krystal G. J.
conditions of the dispositional order were violated. Krystal also argues that the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9323 - 2005-03-31
conditions of the dispositional order were violated. Krystal also argues that the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9323 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the State put Hagen on trial for first-degree intentional homicide, and the jury found Hagen guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656976 - 2023-05-17
, the State put Hagen on trial for first-degree intentional homicide, and the jury found Hagen guilty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=656976 - 2023-05-17
[PDF]
State v. Krystal G. J.
conditions of the dispositional order were violated. Krystal also argues that the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9323 - 2017-09-19
conditions of the dispositional order were violated. Krystal also argues that the trial court did not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9323 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of violating Wis. Stat. § 948.075(1r) (2011-12).[1] The trial court denied Stern’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92443 - 2013-02-05
of violating Wis. Stat. § 948.075(1r) (2011-12).[1] The trial court denied Stern’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92443 - 2013-02-05