Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25091 - 25100 of 29832 for des.

State v. Kevin D. James
166, 172, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). In particular, we review de novo the constitutionality of a statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18877 - 2005-08-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and prejudicial are both questions of law that we review de novo. See State v. Pitsch, 124 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=569074 - 2022-09-22

[PDF] Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222213 - 2018-10-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of law, which we review de novo. Beloit Liquidating Trust v. Grade, 2004 WI 39, ¶17, 270 Wis. 2d 356
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195539 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jerome Sellars
performance was deficient and whether the defendant was prejudiced are questions of law, which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12792 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Carroll, 2001 WI 130, ¶29, 248 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32206 - 2008-03-20

[PDF] WI App 49
of constitutional fact and we review the circuit court’s decision de novo. Id., ¶47. Denny Evidence ¶7 Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245371 - 2019-10-04

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED April 2, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appea...
for the pertinent time period. Discussion ¶3 We review summary judgment de novo, construing the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138946 - 2015-04-01

Steven Pertzsch v. Upper Oconomowoc Lake Association
. 1995). Although summary judgment presents a question of law which we review de novo, we nonetheless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3034 - 2005-03-31

Charles G. Vogel v. Gilbert Russo
the interpretation of an insurance contract and thus presents a question of law that we review de novo. Katze v
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17291 - 2005-03-31