Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25091 - 25100 of 29832 for des.
Search results 25091 - 25100 of 29832 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
those determinations de novo. See id. at 18. The State also has the burden of proving the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45960 - 2010-01-19
those determinations de novo. See id. at 18. The State also has the burden of proving the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45960 - 2010-01-19
COURT OF APPEALS
751. We review decisions to grant or deny summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29516 - 2007-06-27
751. We review decisions to grant or deny summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29516 - 2007-06-27
Adam P. Read v. Susan Riseling
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11561 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11561 - 2005-03-31
Stephanie M. Kaplan v. Susan Riseling
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11560 - 2005-03-31
of the common law doctrine of public officer immunity is a question of law which we review de novo. Kimps v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11560 - 2005-03-31
Jonathan Snapp v. Jessie Jean-Claude, M.D.
judgment is a question of law that we consider de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20970 - 2006-01-17
judgment is a question of law that we consider de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20970 - 2006-01-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
agencies.” DeLao, 252 Wis. 2d 289, ¶21. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236349 - 2019-03-05
agencies.” DeLao, 252 Wis. 2d 289, ¶21. Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236349 - 2019-03-05
Robert Kopfhamer v. Madison Gas and Electric Company
of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3993 - 2005-03-31
of a statute to undisputed facts is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Wilke, 152 Wis. 2d 243
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3993 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI App 22
principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W.2d 625
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34839 - 2014-09-15
principles to those facts de novo.” State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, ¶9, 245 Wis. 2d 206, 629 N.W.2d 625
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34839 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert A. Bruner, Sr. v. Heritage Companies
as the trial court. We owe the trial court no deference and conduct our review de novo. See Schapiro v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13288 - 2017-09-21
as the trial court. We owe the trial court no deference and conduct our review de novo. See Schapiro v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13288 - 2017-09-21
State v. Joel O. Peterson
) as applied to a set of undisputed facts, it presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3496 - 2005-03-31
) as applied to a set of undisputed facts, it presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3496 - 2005-03-31