Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25171 - 25180 of 57351 for id.

WI App 145 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP435-CR Complete Title...
) [is] aware of the general range of penalties that could ... [be] imposed. Id. at 206. The trial court must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72010 - 2011-11-28

State v. David C. Polashek
a decision, the court of appeals exercised its discretion to address the issue. Id.; Polashek, 2001 WI App
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16394 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Thomas More High School v. Elizabeth Burmaster
, the application of those facts to the statute is a question of law.” Id. ¶11 Moreover, “[s]tatutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19237 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
there are proper reasons for substitution.” Id. On appeal, courts “employ the factors set forth in State v. Lomax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34634 - 2008-11-17

[PDF] State v. John P. Hunt
charges in § 948.025(3) is violated.” Id., ¶15. We were persuaded by a California court’s reasoning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3559 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. See id., 331 Wis. 2d 650, ¶23 (“[C]hild support is determined based upon the payor’s gross income
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140994 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Court Efficiencies Final Report to PPAC August 2006
Subcommittee on Court Efficiencies Final Report and Recommendations August 2006 ...
/courts/committees/docs/ppaccourteffienciesrpt.pdf - 2009-11-11

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and the credibility of the witnesses and resolves any conflicts in the testimony. See id. at 503-04. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717027 - 2023-10-17

[PDF] State v. Abimael Trevino, Jr. - 2022AP000821
and the credibility of the witnesses and resolves any conflicts in the testimony. See id. at 503-04. We agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=717027 - 2023-10-17

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
only co-religionists).” Id. at 250. As such, the Supreme Court held, our “interpretation of § 108.02
/supreme/docs/2020AP2007_121525order.pdf - 2025-12-15