Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 25211 - 25220 of 64166 for records.
Search results 25211 - 25220 of 64166 for records.
CA Blank Order
of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that no issue of arguable merit could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116171 - 2014-07-08
of the record as required by Anders and Rule 809.32, we conclude that no issue of arguable merit could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116171 - 2014-07-08
COURT OF APPEALS
considered as a statement of “any other person,” and not as “victims,” the record reflects that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72859 - 2011-10-26
considered as a statement of “any other person,” and not as “victims,” the record reflects that the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72859 - 2011-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of record, correctly in all respects, the actual decision of the court ….” Bostwick v. Van Vleck, 106 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31392 - 2008-01-14
of record, correctly in all respects, the actual decision of the court ….” Bostwick v. Van Vleck, 106 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31392 - 2008-01-14
State v. Marco A. Villa
“any contact” with the district attorney’s office. Because the record indicates that Gitzlaff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13051 - 2005-03-31
“any contact” with the district attorney’s office. Because the record indicates that Gitzlaff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13051 - 2005-03-31
Eddie D. Cannon v. State
. There is evidence in the record to support this determination. Because the 1982 Cadillac was forfeited, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8640 - 2005-03-31
. There is evidence in the record to support this determination. Because the 1982 Cadillac was forfeited, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8640 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the original offense, the [defendant’s] institutional conduct record, as well as the amount of incarceration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30088 - 2014-09-15
of the original offense, the [defendant’s] institutional conduct record, as well as the amount of incarceration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30088 - 2014-09-15
Richard I. Wang, M.D. v. gan Ivankovic
It is clear from the record in this case that the facts are hotly disputed. Dr. Wang claims that Ivankovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7539 - 2005-03-31
It is clear from the record in this case that the facts are hotly disputed. Dr. Wang claims that Ivankovic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7539 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103416 - 2017-09-21
this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103416 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367776 - 2021-05-18
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=367776 - 2021-05-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
practitioner opinions” and “drew unreasonable inferences from [Zwiefelhofer’s] medical records.” Dr. Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60216 - 2014-09-15
practitioner opinions” and “drew unreasonable inferences from [Zwiefelhofer’s] medical records.” Dr. Clark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60216 - 2014-09-15